Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 23:03:37 +0200 (EET) From: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee> To: David Scheidt <dscheidt@enteract.com> Cc: J McKitrick <jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: assembly vs C Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1000509230231.5152F-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96.1000509154027.59545A-100000@shell-2.enteract.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 9 May 2000, David Scheidt wrote: > On Tue, 9 May 2000, J McKitrick wrote: > > > I've heard some debates recently, mostly by 'old-school' hackers from the > > C64 days who are calling for a return to machine language. They claim that > > CPU speed, memory size, and HD space will begin to plateau soon, and that ML > > would bring a much needed return to efficiency and clean coding. > > Anybody who thinks that assembly is going to make a big comeback hasn't > looked at writing code for modern processors. While there are people who > can produce code that is as efficent as the stuff cranked out by a good > compiler, there aren't that many. There aren't nearly as many as there were > during the era of the 6502 and the Z-80. The compilers have gotten much > better and the chips much harder to write code for. I am sure that assembly > will stick around for a while, for things like low-level OS glue, and the > occaisonal tightly optimized loop. I can't imagine anyone writing a large > application in assembly for the Alpha, MIPS, PA-RISC, or IA-64. > You are on a really slippery road, betting against the stupidity of humans... > David > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.1000509230231.5152F-100000>