Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 15:26:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> To: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What happens with SECURELVL? (init complains) Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1000607152627.25644C-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1000607151752.25644B-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Robert Watson wrote: > That said, I'm a little puzzled as to where securelevel is being defined > -- a bunch of stuff depends on the variable and yet my test build > succeeded without it in there. And you go that far also -- far enough to > boot rather than have the linking fail. Nevermind -- I just trimmed the SYSCTL, not the variable declaration. Sorry for inconvenience to all. Robert N M Watson robert@fledge.watson.org http://www.watson.org/~robert/ PGP key fingerprint: AF B5 5F FF A6 4A 79 37 ED 5F 55 E9 58 04 6A B1 TIS Labs at Network Associates, Safeport Network Services To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1000607152627.25644C-100000>