Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 08:59:59 +0700 (ALMST) From: Boris Popov <bp@freebsd.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/miscfs/union union.h union_subr.c union_vnops.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105180854300.21915-100000@lion.butya.kz> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1010517123517.20392A-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Robert Watson wrote: > From owner-cvs-all@freebsd.org Fri Sep 03 00:00:00 1999 > > Yay! Any thoughts on how usable unionfs will be in the near future? Well, recent PR reminded me about an old tree with unionfs fixes. It was stable enough to complete 'make world' and build ports. nullfs and unionfs can be also fixed in -stable after MFC of vop_*vobject VOPs (however vnode locking issues will still be in effect). -- Boris Popov http://www.butya.kz/~bp/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0105180854300.21915-100000>