Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 28 Apr 2002 16:32:57 -0700
From:      "Crist J. Clark" <crist.clark@attbi.com>
To:        Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Richard Arends <richard@unixguru.nl>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: truss
Message-ID:  <20020428163257.K37618@blossom.cjclark.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020428170909.64976O-100000@fledge.watson.org>; from rwatson@FreeBSD.org on Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 05:11:14PM -0400
References:  <20020428134506.J37618@blossom.cjclark.org> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020428170909.64976O-100000@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 05:11:14PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 03:59:44PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
> > [snip]
> > 
> > > In FreeBSD 5.0, all this information is exported from the kernel using the
> > > sysctl() interface, which provides much more information gating, and
> > > flexibe policy controls.  This exists in part in 4.x, but not completely. 
> > > In 5.0, ps requires no special privilege, and access control is done
> > > entirely in the kernel.
> > 
> > I think I'm missing something here.
> > 
> >   $ uname -r
> >   4.5-RELEASE
> >   $ ls -l /bin/ps
> >   -r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  213796 Jan 30 14:30 /bin/ps
> > 
> > ps(1) has no special privileges in 4.x, but I may not understand what
> > you mean by "special privileges?" (To me it means s{u,g}id.)
> 
> Hmm.  I'd forgotten that the setgid kmem was removed in 4.x; I was
> probably thinking of top, which still is setgid in -STABLE.  You'll find
> however, that -e won't work without setgid kmem being turned on.

'-e' for ps(1) seems to work fine on processes you own. You cannot see
the environments of other users' processes (of course root can see
everyone's). But you do need /proc for '-e' to work.

> There
> are a number of other tools in -CURRENT that aren't setgid kmem where they
> are in -STABLE (top, iostat, etc). 

You know, I'm not sure why top(1) needs it if ps(1) doesn't.
-- 
Crist J. Clark                     |     cjclark@alum.mit.edu
                                   |     cjclark@jhu.edu
http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/    |     cjc@freebsd.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020428163257.K37618>