Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 12:01:05 -0500 From: The Anarcat <anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: Mike Heffner <mheffner@vt.edu>, Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of lukemftpd? (was: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf (fwd)) Message-ID: <20021112170102.GA32440@xtanbul.studio.espresso-com.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021112090738.34518A-100000@fledge.watson.org> References: <XFMail.20021109031937.mheffner@vt.edu> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021112090738.34518A-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
How hard would it be to pull to plug on lukemftp[d] and (say) put it back in -ports, for now? On Tue Nov 12, 2002 at 09:09:48AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: [...] > > You do realize that we're in a feature freeze right now, and will be in a > code freeze within days, right? You're coming up a dollar short, and a > day late. This is the reason I've trying to press for a resolution for > weeks now. I'm deeply concerned that we've imported software without > doing any of the necessary mergework and adaptation, and are now > apparently planning to ship it. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021112170102.GA32440>