Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 16:10:35 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: mb@imp.ch Cc: smckay@internode.on.net, mbr@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci if_dc.c Message-ID: <20020922.161035.66904327.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.4.44.0209221610020.867963-100000@nbs.imp.ch> References: <200209221409.g8ME9DB16763@dungeon.home> <Pine.SGI.4.44.0209221610020.867963-100000@nbs.imp.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <Pine.SGI.4.44.0209221610020.867963-100000@nbs.imp.ch>
Martin Blapp <mb@imp.ch> writes:
:
: Hi,
:
: > ... I thought I should explicitly mention that merging this particular
: > change as it stands is a bad idea because PNIC and Davicom cards (at least)
: > are not yet correctly handled. The code in -stable is the old broken but
: > apparently harmless code. This new code is attempting to be more correct
: > but breaks support for some cards. Odd situation, no?
:
: What chips do have these card ? We can just do this check for the admtek
: cards, can we ?
:
: Have we now different cards with the same chips but different behaviour ???
:
: I know that a
:
: 981
: 983
: 983b
: 985
:
: admtek chip exist.
I have a similar problem with the Abocom FE2500 chip that's in one of
my cardbus cards. Or maybe I'm confusing the two recent commits...
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020922.161035.66904327.imp>