Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2000 22:15:56 -0700 From: "Crist J . Clark" <cjclark@reflexnet.net> To: Ali Alaoui El Hassani <961BE653994@stud.alakhawayn.ma> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SOS Help ipsec (Esp Ah) Message-ID: <20000903221556.R62475@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.96.1000904024558.7397C-100000@stud.alakhawayn.ma>; from 961BE653994@stud.alakhawayn.ma on Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 02:46:32AM %2B0000 References: <Pine.SOL.3.96.1000904024558.7397C-100000@stud.alakhawayn.ma>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 02:46:32AM +0000, Ali Alaoui El Hassani wrote: > > Dear All, > > I am running into trouble. I am using tun0 as tunnel of a secure > communication via ESP. I want also to use Ah as another reliable kind of > communication so I thaught about using it via tun1. when I wanted to > create tun1 i.e (I went to GENERIC and modified the number of tunnels > from 1 to 2) and I wanted to recompile the kernel , I had a recompilation > error due to some patch that I applied to my kernel previously. > well the thing is that I can not use point to point links ie sl0,pp0. > Due to time limitations I can not reinstall another kernel. > > My question is: > Do you have any idea on how I can overpass this situation ? Well, you should not need tun(4) devices at all to do IPsec. -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000903221556.R62475>