Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 01:13:53 -0400 From: Dan Janowski <danj@3skel.com> To: Nicholas Charles Brawn <ncb05@uow.edu.au>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: freebsd vs linux (nfs) (fwd) Message-ID: <35650991.A287C82F@3skel.com> References: <Pine.SOL.3.96.980522141426.7243A-100000@wumpus.its.uow.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In regards to the lock manager (rpc.lockd), isn't it, for lack of a better expression, pseudo-locking? Dan Nicholas Charles Brawn wrote: > I was pleased to see the ratings that freebsd received on this. > > Nick > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 14:41:58 -0500 (CDT) > From: tip <tip@enteract.com> > To: dc-stuff@dis.org > Subject: freebsd vs linux (nfs) > > >from unix review's "performance computing" magazine, june 1998, > pages 21-28, > > comparisons are on nt products vs various flavors of unix. > > for simplicity's sake, linux, bsdi, and freebsd are only mentioned here > for comparison of bsd vs linux: > > NFS PROTOCOL SUPPORT > -------------------- > nfs v.2 nfs v.3 webnfs > udp tcp udp tcp > bsdi x x x x > freebsd x x x x x > linux x > > SUPPORT FOR ANCILLARY NFS PROTOCOLS > ----------------------------------- > RPC PORTMAPPER MOUNT PROTOCOL NETWORK LOCK MGR STATUS > Over UDP Over TCP Over UDP Over TCP Over UDP Over TCP UDP TCP > v2 v3 v4 v2 v3 v4 v1 v2 v3 v1 v2 v3 v1 v2 v3 v4 v1 v2 v3 v4 v1 v1 > bsdi x x x x x x > freebsd x x x x x x x x x x x > linux x x x x > > again, i like both freebsd and linux, i'm slightly biased towards freebsd, > just because of its superior networking and security over linux. > > thanx, > - tip > -- danj@3skel.com Dan Janowski Triskelion Systems, Inc. Bronx, NY To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35650991.A287C82F>