Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 06:48:24 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.dialix.com> To: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> Cc: Jeffrey Hsu <hsu@freefall.freebsd.org>, lite2@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs tree preperation.. Message-ID: <199608202248.GAA27976@spinner.DIALix.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 20 Aug 1996 17:41:08 %2B0900." <Pine.SV4.3.93.960820171522.21724A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michael Hancock wrote: > My vote is for 3:. 4: looks very nice, but I think it's better to have > source. Though, I won't complain if 4 is chosen. > > On Mon, 19 Aug 1996, Jeffrey Hsu wrote: > > > > 3: like #2, but place explicit markers on the current branch and use th ose > > > for merging > > > > This is close to what I do locally. > > > > > 4: Give p3 a shot (http://www.p3.com). > > > > I'm game if it's okay with everyone else. I've always wanted to try > > out p3 and this will force me to do so. > > > > So, either 3 or 4 is okay with me. Now that I think about it some more, I dont know that I have the energy to get p3 operational for our use, so it looks like #3 it is (cvsup from main code into /home/lite2, with a private branch and added merge markers) Ok, it sounds like we have a plan. Unless I hear otherwise, I'll set this up after I've had breakfast in a few hours... Cheers, -Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608202248.GAA27976>