Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 20:37:33 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: ache@astral.msk.su (=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=) Cc: CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, ache@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sbin@freefall.freebsd.org, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/slattach uucplock.c Makefile Message-ID: <199509201837.UAA10363@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <WBUXlNmuQ1@ache.dialup.demos.ru> from "=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=" at Sep 19, 95 09:05:34 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= wrote: > > I understand. How you do redialing in your case? I dial manually, so i have to redial manually. :( I have to dial four different phone numbers anyway (and hope one of them might be not BUSY), and that's not handled gracefully by anything than stock UUCP by now. (My dialing wrapper has been the major driving force to let slattach create proper PID files, btw. This allowed me for an "un-dialer". :) If i would like to have fully-automated dialing, i would have used iijppp long since. :-) > >Well, as long as slattach doesn't give up when the lockfile already > >exists, i wouldn't mind. > > It does, that is lockfiles purpose :-( > It seems that I need to make lockfiles by an option, not as default case... An option is fine with me. Thanks! -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509201837.UAA10363>