Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 12:02:23 -0800 From: John Kennedy <warlock@phouka.net> To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tmp and tmpfs Message-ID: <X7rDz%2BRahQvPqdUU@phouka1.phouka.net> In-Reply-To: <X7WsuVUng8Irblc5@rpi4.local> References: <X7KYfEsH0WU6hBxc@rpi4.local> <hUVMLjJ0YusVdfQ01Rcvi_o_h6EGt3TIP57pfF5nS2qkobEr7K9LZmhVz-Vq6BYx5pjtpkjgJBTRBPjdY0S-tA6ji48DdNY7OWOco51WOqo=@protonmail.com> <X7WsuVUng8Irblc5@rpi4.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I found that my choke point was relinking the kernel during the build. On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 11:22:33PM +0000, tech-lists wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 07:25:19AM +0000, Robert Crowston wrote: > >It?ll be significantly faster in memory, it depends if you want to > >spare the ram. > > > >How many temporary files do you have? > > Hi, > > I'm not sure ;) > > I'm not even sure how much space I'll need. Think I'll just have > to test and see. The pi4 isn't used for xorg at all, though things > like mutt and imapsync might use tmp a lot. On a desktop running > kf5-plasma/firefox and all the trimmings, tmp stands at 8.1GB > and the system was rebooted only a couple days ago. The pi4 > has just finished building world/kernel and tmp is 282k. > > Maybe set it to 1GB. I was wondering really if memory pressure > pushes this to swap, if there would be slowdown more significant > overall than if /tmp was just on zfs
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?X7rDz%2BRahQvPqdUU>