Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 10:35:28 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Please review - header cleanups Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104191025270.5424-100000@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010418145006.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, John Baldwin wrote: > On 18-Apr-01 Mark Murray wrote: > > Said John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>: > >> Well, I put that up there because I was under the impression that > >> nested includes were to be avoided at all costs based on previous > >> discussions with Bruce. It seems now that Bruce was more just trying > >> to discourage the practice but not condemning those particular cases > >> as the alternatives were worse. In the case of determing if headers > >> should use nested #includes, etc. I defer to Bruce as he is more > >> authoritative in this area. > > > > Abandon project? > > Whatever Bruce says is to happen as far as header cleanups basically. Try the secondary include idea (see other mail). Then some of your patch will still be relevant. Possible strategy for finding the relevant parts: apply it all, then run phk's include script to find unnecessary parts. I don't want to touch more than the headers now. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0104191025270.5424-100000>