Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 14 Sep 2001 13:58:26 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Doug Ambrisko <ambrisko@ambrisko.com>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Doug Ambrisko <ambrisko@ambrisko.com>, dhw@whistle.com, mark@whistle.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, roam@ringlet.net, msmith@FreeBSD.org, kstewart@urx.com, rnordier@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit?
Message-ID:  <200109142058.f8EKwQI75128@ambrisko.com>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010914135301.jhb@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin writes:
| This is for boot0.  Nothing should be touching boot1 flags.
| My guess is that someone has somehow mixed an old boot2 with the new boot1
| which is jumping to the wrong place to call xread.  The "code" at cs:eip looks
| a lot like the BPB in boot1 now.

Okay that basically how I read the code.  Just wanted to make sure I
wasn't missing something.  Your theory sounds quite possible.

Thanks,

Doug A.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200109142058.f8EKwQI75128>