Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2000 23:21:31 -0500 (EST) From: Colin <cwass99@home.com> To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Mark Newton <newton@internode.com.au>, Christoph Kukulies <kuku@gilberto.physik.RWTH-Aachen.DE> Subject: Re: sppp behaviour Message-ID: <XFMail.20000107232131.cwass99@home.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20000107230737.cwass99@home.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> This is only true if the connection was gone long enough for your lease
> from the DHCP server to expire or the DHCP server is configured to not
> re-issue
> an address requested by a dynamically served host on reconnect.
It occurs to me that I'm assuming a reboot/renew type request when the
connection is re-established. I would think this might not be completely
accurate ;) Thinking about it I would suspect a complete
DHCP-discovery-request-etc would be a better choice here, but I haven't looked
at the code.
----------------------------------
E-Mail: Colin <cwass99@home.com>
Date: 07-Jan-2000
Time: 23:14:38
This message was sent by XFMail
----------------------------------
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20000107232131.cwass99>