Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 12:44:32 -0700 From: Murray Stokely <murray@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: murray@FreeBSD.org, qa@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kde vs. kdebase in sysinstall Message-ID: <20020703124432.D31304@freebsdmall.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20020702154742.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@FreeBSD.org on Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 03:47:42PM -0400 References: <XFMail.20020702154742.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 03:47:42PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > In -stable, you changed sysinstall to install kdebase instead of kde > to save space when the KDE desktop option is chosen. However, you > left it as installing all of kde in current. Is this intentional? > Can we change one or the other so it is consistent? Thanks. Well, I think that was done because not all of the packages were building for -CURRENT, so we had a little more free space to play with, and could fit all of KDE on the -CURRENT discs. Sometime before FreeBSD 4.7 we can put -STABLE back to using the full KDE since we can use multi-volume support to make it all fit on multiple discs. - Mruray To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020703124432.D31304>