Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 15:48:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: julian@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: thread_sanity_check() Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0207111548080.47612-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20020711175511.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
all gone now.. On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > Considering the incredible amount of complaining over having a > cred_free_thread() function conditionally compiled into the kernel > that only did a mutex lock, decrement, and mutex unlock in the common > case, why isn't thread_sanity_check() (or it's body) conditionally > compiled? It's a lot more expensive than cred_free_thread() and isn't > even under INVARIANTS. Pardon me if I find this a bit hypocritical. > > -- > > John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ > "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0207111548080.47612-100000>