Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 13 Dec 2002 19:34:43 -0800
From:      Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha sys_machdep.c
Message-ID:  <20021214033443.GR23663@elvis.mu.org>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20021213222812.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20021214032328.GQ23663@elvis.mu.org> <XFMail.20021213222812.jhb@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> [021213 19:28] wrote:
> 
> On 14-Dec-2002 Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > * Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org> [021213 17:56] wrote:
> >> alfred      2002/12/13 17:56:26 PST
> >> 
> >>   Modified files:
> >>     sys/alpha/alpha      sys_machdep.c 
> >>     sys/alpha/osf1       osf1_misc.c osf1_mount.c osf1_signal.c 
> >>                          osf1_util.h 
> >>   Log:
> >>   SCARGS removal take II.
> > 
> > Please let me know if this introduces any breakage, if it doesn't
> > I have the go ahead to MFC->5.0-RELEASE it so that we don't have
> > too much of a difference between 6 and 5.
> 
> You already don't have the difference between 6 and 5.  By
> virtue of this commit the change is already in both 5.1, 5-stable,
> and 6.0.  RELENG_5_0 is only for 5.0, not 5-stable. :)

till, what I'm trying to avoid is people writing software for 5.0
that will be hard to patch against 5-stable.

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
 start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021214033443.GR23663>