Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 17:12:39 -0700 (PDT) From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Question about cv_signal(9) (never mind) Message-ID: <XFMail.20040612171239.jdp@polstra.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20040612135505.jdp@polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12-Jun-2004 John Polstra wrote: > [Why does a caller to cv_signal(9) have to hold the associated mutex?] Never mind. I understand now. It allows the implementation to avoid doing any locking internally. That seems perfectly reasonable, and I withdraw my question. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20040612171239.jdp>