Date: Fri, 03 Dec 1999 04:00:43 +0900 From: "R. Imura" <imura@cs.titech.ac.jp> To: andrews@technologist.com Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, mlobo@nlink.com.br, kdevelop@barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de Subject: RE: Problem on making kdevelop 1.0beta4.1 Message-ID: <19991203040043I.imura@cs.titech.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.991202114440.andrews@technologist.com> References: <19991202033454E.imura@cs.titech.ac.jp> <XFMail.991202114440.andrews@technologist.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> "obsolete", not "obsoluted". # Oops. Thanks. :) > Why do it this way? We'll have to add this in for ALL the ports that are based > on kde/qt USE_NEWGCC! And then when somebody _FINALLY_ decides to add it to > those ports.. I agree with your idea. But there are about 50 ports having USE_QT=yes (32 ports at FreeBSD-2.2.8) and you have to change all of the ports at the same time. In addition, many people will complain to us while a few weeks after the change for the incompatibility, and we have to say "Please update all of your qt ports" every time. I only worry about it. > You could send me yours so I can fix my "normal kde" version. :-) > > Or is it available on that URL you posted? Is it ok? (japanese mail + uuencode) http://home.jp.FreeBSD.org/cgi-bin/showmail/ports-jp/8285 --- R. Imura To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991203040043I.imura>