Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 4 Feb 2023 11:12:34 -0700
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-git <freebsd-git@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Proposed Github Pull Request Policy
Message-ID:  <CANCZdfox%2Bbd1nRZDgkOhy57TW=UasAjVX_MnrBwOep55CftCog@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <Y905cVvlrQ5YPqgA@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net>
References:  <CANCZdfq_=pDon8LmhjV%2BWyPsGcuG1hp3LrfxXe9mJ51J0P2iqg@mail.gmail.com> <Y905cVvlrQ5YPqgA@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--0000000000000d60ef05f3e3bee9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 9:42 AM Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 07:12:29PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> > Geetngs,
> >
> > I'd like to put some parameters around the pull requests on github. To
> that
> > end, I'd like us to consider the following policy:
>
> This seems like a good start.
>
> > Pull requests shouldn't expand in scope in response to feedback: If the
> > feedback suggests a new series of changes, please create a new pull
> > requests.
>
> I think I'd prefer: "Pull requests shouldn't expand in scope once
> created:...".
>
> Some direction on using rebase and forced push when addressing feedback is
> probably also in order.  If I'm taking a few minutes to look at a PR that
> caught my eye I don't want to wade through a bunch of fixups.
>

I've written this up as https://reviews.freebsd.org/D38382 which I'm open
to feedback on. Especially other areas of the docs that need to be fixed to
be consistent.

Warner

--0000000000000d60ef05f3e3bee9
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
<div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 9:42 AM Brooks=
 Davis &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:brooks@freebsd.org">brooks@freebsd.org</a>&gt;=
 wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px =
0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Thu, =
Feb 02, 2023 at 07:12:29PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:<br>
&gt; Geetngs,<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; I&#39;d like to put some parameters around the pull requests on github=
. To that<br>
&gt; end, I&#39;d like us to consider the following policy:<br>
<br>
This seems like a good start.<br>
<br>
&gt; Pull requests shouldn&#39;t expand in scope in response to feedback: I=
f the<br>
&gt; feedback suggests a new series of changes, please create a new pull<br=
>
&gt; requests.<br>
<br>
I think I&#39;d prefer: &quot;Pull requests shouldn&#39;t expand in scope o=
nce<br>
created:...&quot;.<br>
<br>
Some direction on using rebase and forced push when addressing feedback is<=
br>
probably also in order.=C2=A0 If I&#39;m taking a few minutes to look at a =
PR that<br>
caught my eye I don&#39;t want to wade through a bunch of fixups.<br></bloc=
kquote><div><br></div><div>I&#39;ve written this up as <a href=3D"https://r=
eviews.freebsd.org/D38382">https://reviews.freebsd.org/D38382</a>; which I&#=
39;m open to feedback on. Especially other areas of the docs that need to b=
e fixed to be consistent.</div><div><br></div><div>Warner<br> </div></div><=
/div>

--0000000000000d60ef05f3e3bee9--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfox%2Bbd1nRZDgkOhy57TW=UasAjVX_MnrBwOep55CftCog>