Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 6 Oct 2021 01:04:58 +0300
From:      "George L. Yermulnik" <yz@yz.kiev.ua>
To:        dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: git: fb5f03a87cf4 - main - Mk/bsd.lto.mk: add global LTO support for ports
Message-ID:  <20211005220458.GF33079@yz.kiev.ua>
In-Reply-To: <YVzKR0wwAkfOFurC@KGPE-D16>
References:  <202109301834.18UIYKrL013410@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <20211004133056.z7e2iyrhlwprvvvp@aching.in.mat.cc> <YVx84wGVlSr2nmBX@KGPE-D16> <20211005163152.gv2vwvg4nuqwga7q@aching.in.mat.cc> <YVyCEPlZJvdce4Ak@KGPE-D16> <44365771-0a1d-7bcb-2cb6-85f592624a3b@FreeBSD.org> <YVy4gsubg0nsG1Nq@KGPE-D16> <607e0aa1-3888-8a61-f80f-0aad1d53ea23@FreeBSD.org> <YVzKR0wwAkfOFurC@KGPE-D16>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Yes, but my personal poudriere builders are on disk-space constrained
> > VMs so get maximum parallelity within one job, and run few jobs in
> > parallel.  It's not ideal, but I can't build LLVM, Rust, and JDK or
> > texmf in parallel with its truckloads-of-GBytes build directories.

> > Before committing intrusive changes, we normally do -exp runs.
> > Personally, for OpenEXR which is one of the more "central" ports I have,
> > I dare building all ports depending on it locally before committing, if
> > I couldn't do that I'd have to go for an -exp run.
> I myself have enough RAM for using LTO even with large software. If your hardware can't allow that, there were free Azure VMs that AFAIK were quite beefy.

Does it mean that every ordinary FreeBSD user would need to spin up an Azure VM to just build a port on their own?

-- 
George L. Yermulnik
[YZ-RIPE]



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20211005220458.GF33079>