Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 12:49:07 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Rene Ladan <portmgr-secretary@freebsd.org>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some ports tree policy changes Message-ID: <5BA3407E-A605-45B5-AC69-DB21056B8DB6@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <YmUcUy%2BLjowsgljF@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <YmUcUy%2BLjowsgljF@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 24 avril 2022 11:45:55 GMT+02:00, Rene Ladan <portmgr-secretary@freebsd= =2Eorg> a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: >Hello, > >portmgr discussed releasing a lot of files in Mk/ to the general public (= i=2Ee=2E >you) a few weeks ago=2E This is to encourage people to work on this kind = of >infrastructure, make it less exclusive to portmgr and perhaps make it fee= l >less scary=2E The first change, https://reviews=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/D34936, h= as just been >committed as https://cgit=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/ports/commit/?id=3D767d81e1296a= 49573aaa24dfc9677f801fddc6d4 > >Documentation on these infrastructure files might be lacking somewhat at = the >moment=2E This documentation should describe the rationale and possible p= itfalls=2E >Portmgr is looking for a way to do this properly=2E > >Portmgr does reserve the right to revert commits in case too much things = break >with a commit to Mk/ =2E Things that could be worked on are: >- converting Mk/bsd=2EX=2Emk to USES=3DX >- adding more triggers to prevent duplicated actions while (de)installing= or > upgrading multiple packages at once >- <your idea here> > >Regards, >Ren=C3=A9 on behalf of portmgr To complement it is still stronglh recommended to seek for review by portm= gr and request for exp-run for such changes=2E Best regards Bapt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5BA3407E-A605-45B5-AC69-DB21056B8DB6>