Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 4 Jan 2024 09:55:40 -0500
From:      Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
To:        John Kennedy <warlock@phouka.net>
Cc:        Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>
Subject:   Re: ZFS problems since recently ?
Message-ID:  <67aa4991-cbcb-23f5-5234-47285861dece@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <ZZa-qvukYepDYOVk@phouka1.phouka.net>
References:  <ZZG0RdFTqfbfPwf7@fc.opsec.eu> <ZZH2YIXm75emBbpp@phouka1.phouka.net> <ZZIPYzWKZ1R_pMHQ@phouka1.phouka.net> <ZZJRHnA6Kgs3TdCF@fc.opsec.eu> <ZZLFQa1qZ0as01AU@phouka1.phouka.net> <ea6cb256-3000-3822-1734-258f84635c46@FreeBSD.org> <ZZTcPBnStMx7Gdxf@phouka1.phouka.net> <ZZa-qvukYepDYOVk@phouka1.phouka.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John,

On 04.01.2024 09:20, John Kennedy wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 08:02:04PM -0800, John Kennedy wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 05:51:32PM -0500, Alexander Motin wrote:
>>> On 01.01.2024 08:59, John Kennedy wrote:
>>>>   ...
>>>>     My poudriere build did eventually fail as well:
>>>> 	...
>>>> 	[05:40:24] [01] [00:17:20] Finished devel/gdb@py39 | gdb-13.2_1: Success
>>>> 	[05:40:24] Stopping 2 builders
>>>> 	panic: VERIFY(BP_GET_DEDUP(bp)) failed
>>>
>>> Please see/test: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/15732 .
>>
>>    It came back today at the end of my poudriere build.  Your patch has fixed
>> it, so far at least.
> 
>    At the risk of conflating this with other ZFS issues, I beat on the VM a lot
> more last night without triggering any panics.  My usual busy-workload is a
> total kernel+world rebuild (with whatever pending patches might be out), then
> a poudriere run (~230 or so packages).  It's weird that the first (much bigger)
> run worked but later ones didn't (where maybe I had one port that failed to
> build), triggering the panic.  Seemed repeatable, but don't have a feel for
> the exact trigger like the sysctl issue.

What is the panic you see now?  It can not be the same, since the dedup 
assertion is no longer there.

-- 
Alexander Motin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?67aa4991-cbcb-23f5-5234-47285861dece>