Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 16:01:22 -0700 From: "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net> To: Marek Zarychta <zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> Cc: Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@FreeBSD.org>, <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>, <sjg@juniper.net> Subject: Re: filemon Message-ID: <1083.1722121282@kaos.jnpr.net> In-Reply-To: <ZqUMgp8gcsY6iuAF@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> References: <ZqT6_a_0F8DCUsBm@int21h> <CAFDf7UKxhSu%2BqMGV1KahrSX9ho8vFut4avxNVX4D8QGa6%2B%2BTjQ@mail.gmail.com> <ZqUMgp8gcsY6iuAF@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Marek Zarychta <zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> wrote: > > What about filesystem perfomnace ? Have you benchmarked your FS and > whole system with and without filemon loaded ? FWIW filemon does nothing unless make opens the device. and then it only impacts syscalls done by that pid and its children. > I am not questionining the usecase, but loading this module only when > it's required seems to be more resonable for me. > > -- > Marek Zarychta
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1083.1722121282>