Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 20:36:10 +0200 From: Lothar Scholz <scholz@scriptolutions.com> To: pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: Are named posix semaphores not implemented? Message-ID: <123863765.20090509203610@scriptolutions.com> In-Reply-To: <a31046fc0905091052m738a0f6dm6be4f871d83df97f@mail.gmail.com> References: <976698487.20090509182307@scriptolutions.com> <a31046fc0905091052m738a0f6dm6be4f871d83df97f@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello pluknet, p> First, you should have sem(4) capacity enabled in kernel p> (via kldload or statically built). It seems you haven't. Yes - but it was a total fresh PC-BSD build. I must say that i really don't like this start off with anything disabled. They will never get a good desktop os if the user can't run simple programs without the need to learn about kernel modules. Well this is the wrong list to discuss this anyway. -- Best regards, Lothar Scholz mailto:scholz@scriptolutions.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?123863765.20090509203610>