Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 20:09:41 +0200 From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> To: Yuri Pankov <yuripv@gmx.com> Cc: "Sijmen J. Mulder" <ik@sjmulder.nl>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should I use mdoc for user programs? Message-ID: <20171012200941.49fed687.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <ad6d583f-db2e-a149-105d-b7c3b8894959@gmx.com> References: <cd1d3215-bfcd-57bf-89ec-c78981c60381@sjmulder.nl> <ad6d583f-db2e-a149-105d-b7c3b8894959@gmx.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 16:18:28 +0300, Yuri Pankov wrote: > On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 11:02:49 +0200, Sijmen J. Mulder wrote: > [...] > > I noticed that the required .Os macro (man 7 mdoc) outputs "FreeBSD > > General Commands Manual" which does not seem appropriate. > > It's not about the .Os macro, rather it's man-section-to-name mapping > done by the formatter used, i.e. when using mandoc(1), on FreeBSD > section 1 man pages would say "FreeBSD General Commands Manual", on > illumos exactly the *same* man page would say just "User Commands" (for > mandoc this can be customized editing one of the source files currently). According to "man mdoc", it's easy to redefine .Dt at the beginning of the document (just like .Dt or Dd). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171012200941.49fed687.freebsd>