Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 17:53:13 +0700 (ICT) From: Olivier Nicole <on@cs.ait.ac.th> To: wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Remotely edit user disk quota Message-ID: <200905281053.n4SArD5G046750@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905281245320.59208@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> (message from Wojciech Puchar on Thu, 28 May 2009 12:46:47 %2B0200 (CEST)) References: <200905281030.n4SAUXdA046386@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905281234430.59126@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <200905281041.n4SAfTHw046546@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905281245320.59208@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> use rsh and .rhosts :) > > > > I do that already, not really what I call secure ;) > > Could you please explain why it is not secure in your case? > > I don't know exactly the environment in your case so i can't answer for > sure, but most probably it's perfectly secure. Because rsh/rlogin etc. is unsecure in any case. I don't remember the details, I think it has to do with the way it checks (or do not check) that the hosts are the one they pretend they are. Olivier
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200905281053.n4SArD5G046750>