Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:36:47 +1000 From: peterjeremy@optushome.com.au To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is RTL8139 THAT bad? Message-ID: <20090623073647.GA7501@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906221311210.28638@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906211709420.1184@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20090622001705.GA10712@michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906221311210.28638@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2009-Jun-22 13:12:08 +0200, Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia= =2Epl> wrote: >i know all this, but i'm asking why processing single interrupt takes=20 >40000 CPU cycles. All I can suggest is that you browse the sources and see what the rl(4) interrupt handler does. If you want to dig further, hwpmc(4) may give you further insights. --=20 Peter Jeremy --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkpAhg8ACgkQ/opHv/APuIe8TgCghD67YxktOheKlSi/7T1mtqOF b1oAoKfDapDu3h2Yicj7ZsMD4SPHnqe0 =XyVL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090623073647.GA7501>