Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:25:51 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> To: jhell <jhell@DataIX.net> Cc: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@black-earth.co.uk>, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi <lenzi.sergio@gmail.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Ports Problem - Please help Message-ID: <4B759D2F.5090608@bsdforen.de> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1002121213580.48230@pragry.qngnvk.ybpny> References: <6790187d1002112022q1a0dcd1dxbf9accdba50167c9@mail.gmail.com> <4B7516AA.3010600@black-earth.co.uk> <20100212062506.247d25d5@scorpio.seibercom.net> <4B754270.9030001@black-earth.co.uk> <1265977673.5468.5.camel@lenzinote> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1002121213580.48230@pragry.qngnvk.ybpny>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
jhell wrote: > > > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:27, lenzi.sergio@ wrote: >> try to make it work again (with the now missing libjpeg.so.10... >> by inserting a line in the /etc/libmap.conf > >> echo "libjpeg.so.10 libjpeg.so" >> /etc/libmap.conf > >> than probably all will work again... by the time you build all ports, >> the later will be linked agains version 11.. and than you can >> delete the line in the libmap.conf > > >> Hope this will help..... > > > Among all these you may find it useful to install sysutils/libchk. > > This utility can play a key role in locating just the packages/ports > that need to be rebuilt against the new library. Hmm, I just tested it, because my port sysutils contains pkg_libchk, which has a very similar function. My script needs 6m14.73s for a full run, whereas libchk only requires 3m56.38s. However libchk yields a lot of false positives, it's quite difficult to find the information you need. The output of pkg_libchk looks like that: hdf5-1.6.9_1: /usr/local/bin/h5perf misses libh5test.so.0 So it's a lot easier to make a list of broken ports. It also only lists directly linked libraries, so it really only lists the packages that need relinking. A lot of its runtime is dedicated to detecting false positives. It doesn't have libchk's ability to list unused libraries, though. Regards -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B759D2F.5090608>