Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 09:57:50 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: "J. Hellenthal" <jhell@DataIX.net> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Updating multiple ports with portmaster Message-ID: <4D8F6C8E.50902@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1103270548220.92275@qvfongpu.qngnvk.ybpny> References: <61994f32f152b25487eaf153546ab59f@flabnapple.net> <4D8E18AF.6010906@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1103270548220.92275@qvfongpu.qngnvk.ybpny>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/27/2011 03:07, J. Hellenthal wrote: > Hi Doug, ...Everyone else, > > Since were on the (-i) subject here. > > Do you have any plans in the near future to implement a way for > <end-user> to change the default questioning response from [y] to [n] ? No, sorry. I think it would be very confusing to the average user for the default to be different in different circumstances. > This is speaking strictly in the sense of: > "===>>> Update portname-X.Y,Z? y/n [y]" > > And with the above list of ports I think I would rather hit [Return] 50 > times than [n][Return] portmaster is really designed with the idea of keeping all of your ports up to date, not cherry-picking updates. If you have specific ports that you want to keep at a certain version there are at least 2 other ways that you can do that besides -i. I suggest that a thorough reading of the man page may be in order. :) hth, Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D8F6C8E.50902>