Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 16:05:56 +0200 From: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> To: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@jroberson.net> Cc: jeff@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE on sparc64 Message-ID: <20110524140556.GG54929@alchemy.franken.de> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1105201025350.1593@desktop> References: <20110519195245.GA3039@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20110520103841.GA40497@alchemy.franken.de> <20110520124102.GA80878@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20110520150439.GR92688@alchemy.franken.de> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1105201025350.1593@desktop>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:37:31AM -1000, Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Fri, 20 May 2011, Marius Strobl wrote: > > >>>The bottom line > >>>is that watching the various mailing lists so far didn't provide the > >>>necessary motivation to work on that to me though (even today you still > >>>find reports about performance problems with SCHED_ULE and suggestions > >>>to use SCHED_4BSD instead, just see 4DD55CE0.50202@m5p.com as current > >>>example). > > Can you give me another reference to this? No, sorry, this was just one complaint about SCHED_ULE I noticed that day. Marius
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110524140556.GG54929>