Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:47:35 -0400 From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> To: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> Cc: Stas Verberkt <legolas@legolasweb.nl>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What replaces csup? Message-ID: <20568.35207.358811.910253@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209180724130.65590@wonkity.com> References: <D97788AE24B7FFB0C79AA6FB@localhost> <k38bct$ang$1@ger.gmane.org> <780066C6E2FAB67A997876B7@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> <20567.50041.903201.979498@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209172102400.26215@wonkity.com> <75ca1e92e2a51857615e193434898bf5@homey.local> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209180724130.65590@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warren Block writes: > You're right. 'svn blame', for instance, retrieves the history > from the repository. So it's not as bad as it could be... but > that 700M number was from a ports tree checkout. My source > checkout shows 869M in .svn. That's a pretty large chunk of > bandwidth for data that is useless to someone who just wants to > do a buildworld, as opposed to actually working on the source. Having no idea about what's inside the black box ... it would be nice to be able to specify a default level of commit retireval with overrides on a per-subtree basis. Robert Huff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20568.35207.358811.910253>