Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 26 Nov 2012 06:47:15 -0600
From:      Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com>
To:        FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: When Is The Ports Tree Going To Be Updated?
Message-ID:  <50B364D3.9020200@tundraware.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1211252209240.26899@wonkity.com>
References:  <50B2A57A.3050500@tundraware.com> <50B2A8D8.90301@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1211252209240.26899@wonkity.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/25/2012 11:17 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Nov 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
>> On 25/11/2012 23:10, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>>> After the recent security scare, I know the ports tree was temporarily
>>> frozen.  Does anyone know when it will again be updates.  I just upgraded
>>> to 9.1-PRE and need to rebuild Firefox & Thunderbird against the new
>>> libraries and ... they're broken, marked as security hazards...
>>
>> It's been being updated normally since near enough a week ago.
>> "Normally" means subject to the pre-9.1-RELEASE restrictions on sweeping
>> changes as is usual at this point in a release cycle.
>>
>> FireFox 17 and Thunderbird 17 updates were committed to ports on 20th
>> November.
>
> Hmm.  Is the index file being rebuilt?  With FF16 installed, and 17 in the port directory, portsdb -Fu && portversion -vl'<' shows nothing to update.
>
> After 'make index', it does show.

The problem was that I was missing the 'fetch' verb in my portsnap command.

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tim Daneliuk     tundra@tundraware.com
PGP Key:         http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50B364D3.9020200>