Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 06:47:15 -0600 From: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com> To: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: When Is The Ports Tree Going To Be Updated? Message-ID: <50B364D3.9020200@tundraware.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1211252209240.26899@wonkity.com> References: <50B2A57A.3050500@tundraware.com> <50B2A8D8.90301@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1211252209240.26899@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/25/2012 11:17 PM, Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 25 Nov 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote: > >> On 25/11/2012 23:10, Tim Daneliuk wrote: >>> After the recent security scare, I know the ports tree was temporarily >>> frozen. Does anyone know when it will again be updates. I just upgraded >>> to 9.1-PRE and need to rebuild Firefox & Thunderbird against the new >>> libraries and ... they're broken, marked as security hazards... >> >> It's been being updated normally since near enough a week ago. >> "Normally" means subject to the pre-9.1-RELEASE restrictions on sweeping >> changes as is usual at this point in a release cycle. >> >> FireFox 17 and Thunderbird 17 updates were committed to ports on 20th >> November. > > Hmm. Is the index file being rebuilt? With FF16 installed, and 17 in the port directory, portsdb -Fu && portversion -vl'<' shows nothing to update. > > After 'make index', it does show. The problem was that I was missing the 'fetch' verb in my portsnap command. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50B364D3.9020200>