Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:15:35 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> To: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Another CSS suggestion: pre-wrap Message-ID: <51F59807.4040308@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307281603580.11880@wonkity.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307281057160.9642@wonkity.com> <51F558D2.1010808@FreeBSD.org> <51F56688.5040900@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307281308390.10705@wonkity.com> <51F57011.2000603@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307281328360.10705@wonkity.com> <51F57C6E.9050608@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307281603580.11880@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2013.07.29. 0:09, Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 28 Jul 2013, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > >> On 2013.07.28. 21:37, Warren Block wrote: >>> >>> Line numbering is nice sometimes, although sometimes it's easy to >>> confuse with content. Syntax highlighting could be useful in places >>> like the Architecture Handbook, but as you say, we don't have it now. >>> >>> Would you agree that using this line wrap now would not prevent >>> switching to other methods in the future? > >> I believe it is possible to make them work together. But using these >> extensions requires using Saxon as the XSLT processor, which is >> Java-based and slower than xsltproc. Even if we end up using Java >> for PDF rendering, it would be better to keep the XHTML build fast >> and Java-free so that committers can easily test their work. > > Do you mean Java is needed to do the linewrap on XHTML, or that it > would be needed to do line numbers and syntax highlighting? For the latter two only. Gabor
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51F59807.4040308>