Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 15:08:49 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no> To: FreeBSD stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: security/rkhunter 1.4.2 and fdescfs mounted on /dev/fd Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1406111504390.50551@mail.fig.ol.no> In-Reply-To: <20140611130307.GA62128@behemoth> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1406111257200.50551@mail.fig.ol.no> <20140611130307.GA62128@behemoth>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:03-0400, Chris Nehren wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 13:06:57 +0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > > shells/bash more or less requires fdescfs mounted on /dev/fd, in case > > someone wondered. > > What kinds of things fail when this isn't the case? I've not > heard of or seen any issues with shells/bash and I don't have > fdescfs mounted. I'm not sure. My daily use of bash is not impaired by the lack of fdescfs. I have, however, enabled fdescfs on an experimental system, as per the instructions in shells/bash/pkg-message. Thus, my effort to try and keep rkhunter happy on said system. -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 11 13:16:28 2014 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04F5DF7A for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 13:16:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x22f.google.com (mail-we0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 689712648 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 13:16:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id p10so9100299wes.34 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 06:16:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=RlcUR3q/vKskCDXUX9ZolD8paljn40X+hBnBO+fxVGo=; b=b2MBtArcSesxLKzmDnfC6fImkXyUg1PEOW2qEzZ/B5JpcQSPbrgRkNDrcjZCTbawyi c6L1YVnSv0Jl3R0w9lF+sNcMFCIeQ0BIBEhPX/kcfP1zsosn6c8aHCAbdgnr1lzjUAFr Y5rcFk1BBUqJ+Yg+/l8jt9R1j9WKkOyRUZ9ITEg3Oja5s5WVKviBJmUsvB71RInw9LDg IgjwArChTS4yJUMQYqEr18XxYMSFpbGGVAA9RXhlRshrVLeRChZ2oR98L03mAdQizsjH P1CTz53bVC2gTeXAb6mgCJclzDaNEc4SKtUL5ZgFW9fhKFkJ/XqPlpz4nxUlxVtmq28G HLXw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.13.113 with SMTP id g17mr48029321wic.48.1402492580649; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 06:16:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.71.131 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 06:16:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140611130307.GA62128@behemoth> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1406111257200.50551@mail.fig.ol.no> <20140611130307.GA62128@behemoth> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:16:20 -0400 Message-ID: <CAKFCL4V_rKA6GKzp3ANhEWmWSwCHwJNbcZkq3_B5BWcWScfKqg@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: security/rkhunter 1.4.2 and fdescfs mounted on /dev/fd From: Brandon Allbery <allbery.b@gmail.com> To: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>, <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 13:16:28 -0000 On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Chris Nehren < cnehren+freebsd-stable@pobox.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 13:06:57 +0200, Trond Endrest=C3=B8l wrote: > > shells/bash more or less requires fdescfs mounted on /dev/fd, in case > > someone wondered. > > What kinds of things fail when this isn't the case? I've not > heard of or seen any issues with shells/bash and I don't have > fdescfs mounted. > <(command) / >(command) syntax requires it on many platforms. Although I'm told this is actually something of a configure (or configuration) bug and it may not actually be needed in all cases; the bash port's notes do specify that it is needed though. --=20 brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associate= s allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.ne= t unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.ne= t
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1406111504390.50551>