Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 12:46:05 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> To: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: <application> appearance in HTML Message-ID: <20140630124605.7e08b705@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1406292134010.20434@lightning.wonkity.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1406292134010.20434@lightning.wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Warren, On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 21:39:47 -0600 (MDT) Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> wrote: > Erich Dollansky wrote: > > > I would keep it and I would keep it as bold. I would only recommend > > a consequent use of it. Using bold helps to find important > > locations a bit faster without reading the whole sentence. > ... > > The moment the highlighting will only be used for the application > > and not for the manufacturer, it will be very helpful for the > > reader. > > Sorry, I missed this message until posting the link to the thread in > the commit message. > do not worry about this. > A problem with highlighting in general is that too much of it hides > detail. Some sections of our documents look like "poison pen" > letters due to all the highlighting. This is the negative side effect. > > For now, let's try letting application names just be pointed out by > capital letters. If that does not work, we can try something else. We will see the result and the comments soon. Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140630124605.7e08b705>