Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 15 Jun 2016 10:28:21 +0200
From:      Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
To:        Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
Cc:        Manish Jain <bourne.identity@hotmail.com>, User Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Anything special to do moving to SSD?
Message-ID:  <20160615102821.3621f8ce.freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1606142010400.58507@wonkity.com>
References:  <VI1PR02MB097476EA28325B53239D0E05F6540@VI1PR02MB0974.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <20160614191900.c70ccf60478738d0a8b0e44f@sohara.org> <VI1PR02MB0974C37334CBAD5D2AFA44ABF6550@VI1PR02MB0974.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1606142010400.58507@wonkity.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 20:16:53 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, Manish Jain wrote:
> 
> >> Provided the existing filesystems will fit on the SSD a migrate in
> >> place is quite easy. I have done this quite recently based on the
> >> excellent write up here
> >> http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/ssd.html - don't treat it as
> >> a step-by-step adapt it to your setup (not hard).
> >>
> >
> > I am bothered by this thought. Let's say my old SATA disk is da0 and I
> > attach the SSD as da1 for copying the filesystem via dump+restore. Next
> > I remove the SATA entirely and reboot. Now will the SSD still be da1 ?
> > If not, then I have no way of knowing how to configure /etc/fstab for
> > the SSD.
> 
> Use GPT labels.  Or UFS filesystem labels:
> http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/labels.html

A very important advice. Labels make it easier to recognize the
purpose of partitions by name (instead of number), and they also
"survive" if a disk gets moved from system to system.



> Even on single-disk systems, labels make it easier to deal with 
> partitions.

Even on single-disk systems, device names might change due to a
system update: A disk that has been known as ad4 could come up
as ada0 after an improved "controller" has been introduced to
the kernel. :-)



> Yes.  But unless you have a strong requirement to run XP on bare 
> hardware (like for games), install VirtualBox and run it as a VM.  That 
> makes it easy to transplant elsewhere when the need arises.

And it saves you a lot of trouble getting "drivers" for hardware
that has been considered "outdated" and isn't supported anymore
by "Windows" or by its manufacturer.


-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160615102821.3621f8ce.freebsd>