Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:40:40 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Alternatives to rsync Message-ID: <062733f6-c608-853f-280b-a61a84495a21@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1610130114160.26184@nog2.angryox.com> References: <0F5C36816EB64D09B42932E21FBC6269@RIVENDELL> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1610130114160.26184@nog2.angryox.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 13.10.2016 um 07:20 schrieb Peter Beckman: > 2. Why is GPL3 out of the question? Is the user going to resell the > device > as a service? If the user is simply "using" the software, no > disclosure > of other software is necessary. Only if your user is attempting to > "make > money" from the sale of the software or service powered by rsync doe= s > the source need to be disclosed.=20 What does the GPLv3 have to do with reselling software as a service? The _Affero_ GPL variants are what copyleft software-as-a-service, not the plain GPLv3 itself.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?062733f6-c608-853f-280b-a61a84495a21>