Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 14:42:03 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Upgraded clang, llvm and lldb to 3.5.0 Message-ID: <54AEDD8B.1020306@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1501081319070.23489@multics.mit.edu> References: <528C023D-6207-4054-917B-05D4C4E605EC@FreeBSD.org> <EFC6D802-831E-4FE7-B356-BB38A214EE11@netapp.com> <C159AC6F-9DD0-4A66-A665-ABEED5A3B368@gmail.com> <12132B80-E31B-4782-B69E-C9B8F6E6F0B8@netapp.com> <54AE72BF.5040405@hot.ee> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1501081319070.23489@multics.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/8/2015 1:21 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > I have no specific data about this specific case, but the advertised > procedure for upgrading between major branches is to update to the tip of > the starting branch before attempting the major version jump, i.e., update > to the tip of stable/9 before attempting to go to stable/10 or head. Actually, there seems to be a new caveat to this discussed in https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2015-January/081521.html ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54AEDD8B.1020306>