Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 12:25:30 +0900 From: Tatsuki Makino <tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com> To: robert@rrbrussell.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> Subject: Re: How do I clear no-longer-usable packages from poudriere? Message-ID: <SI2PR01MB5036075B10EF2CB8B36B7343FA232@SI2PR01MB5036.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> In-Reply-To: <b505f43a-55c1-433c-94a9-19d1f3275468@app.fastmail.com> References: <ZeTCYZsGM1zpLKa9@albert.catwhisker.org> <SI2PR01MB503659B034FB871D749A13FDFA5C2@SI2PR01MB5036.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> <ZeURpqsFf0gieUdY@albert.catwhisker.org> <b505f43a-55c1-433c-94a9-19d1f3275468@app.fastmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Wolfskill wrote on 2024/03/04 09:11: > I am. however, also concerned about recently-installed packages that > appear to have references to obsolete libraries, such as libc.so.6. (I > had written earlier that I had not had libc.so.6 on my systems since 18 > February. That is technically true, but misleading: a backup image from > 01 January has libc.so.7, not libc.so.6. So I have no idea how a > recently-built package would have references to libc.so.6.) One of the reasons for the name libc.so.6 was also present, including the following https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260434 Or, if linux emulator is used, it also contains *.6 of lib.c. robert@rrbrussell.com wrote on 2024/03/04 10:21: > Read the poudrière-pkgclean man page. It covers all the specifics about how to remove already built packages from poudrière’s package trees. I know that, but this time I dared to avoid it :) Because it can be a heinous package cleaner for those who are only making part of the package. If everyone lost their favorite rust package, it would be a catastrophe :) If used, it is strongly recommended to check in advance which packages will be deleted by the dry run. Regards.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?SI2PR01MB5036075B10EF2CB8B36B7343FA232>