Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:52:48 -0700 From: Qing Li <qingli@freebsd.org> To: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com> Subject: Re: svn commit: r198306 - head/sys/net Message-ID: <9ace436c0910202052r1d1235dax774290a4fa1ee842@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <bc2d970910202030u2c03571etb6379cf29260617d@mail.gmail.com> References: <d873d5be0910201621h768e126dq34df38c07b83fe47@mail.gmail.com> <bc2d970910201734o332582ceic30fb7e42e14c812@mail.gmail.com> <d873d5be0910201900w67833e83kf53b556e2b5c8d00@mail.gmail.com> <bc2d970910202030u2c03571etb6379cf29260617d@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
b.f., I think you are right in saying those code blocks should have "#ifdef SMP" condition around them. I am in the process of make those changes. Thanks, -- Qing On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com> wrote: > Judging from the checkin comment, it is not intended to only eliminate > the call to sched_bind in the non-SMP case. =A0However. you asked > whether it would work correctly in the non-SMP case and I answered > that question. > > Ryan >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9ace436c0910202052r1d1235dax774290a4fa1ee842>