Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 12:34:33 -0400 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org, rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru Cc: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru: Patch for "device_attach: estX attach returned 6" on half of the cores] Message-ID: <200905261234.42869.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <bmsUSJUJCbwn5ZyJw40fq5MWtDs@XX1fo6zQUfC4h0jjRC6IBz3oNH4> References: <iot%2BY4Rq1CfuAcIpIia6VCDhJXE@10Ilc7MfiXA2JVIRVQpZfk7cTQ4> <FE72EA4E-1A89-4F9F-8E78-EABA6654B701@gmail.com> <bmsUSJUJCbwn5ZyJw40fq5MWtDs@XX1fo6zQUfC4h0jjRC6IBz3oNH4>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 05:54 am, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Rui, good day. > > Tue, May 26, 2009 at 01:16:37AM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote: > > > If someone have ACPI tables with processor aliases -- the patch > > > can help > > > to attach est instances. I'd appreciate any testing and may be > > > some knowledgeable person can review this and help to commit > > > the patch. > > > > Regarding to the code in the patch, is this your code or > > something from a more recent ACPI-CA? > > It's mine ;)) Though I hadn't looked at the newer ACPI-CA yet. --- >8 --- SNIP!!! --- >8 --- As I posted earlier, it should be fixed in the newer ACPI-CA: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200905041551.19904.jkim Sorry, if you missed it. Jung-uk Kim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200905261234.42869.jkim>