Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 02 Jul 2021 03:05:51 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 256923] textproc/py-sphinx: Remove or make OPTION'al dependency on security/ca_root_nss dependency
Message-ID:  <bug-256923-7788-euHp45U1hX@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-256923-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-256923-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256923

Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|textproc/py-sphinx: remove  |textproc/py-sphinx: Remove
                   |dependency to               |or make OPTION'al
                   |security/ca_root_nss or     |dependency on
                   |make it configurable        |security/ca_root_nss
                   |                            |dependency
           Assignee|ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org      |python@FreeBSD.org
           See Also|                            |https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
                   |                            |gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D2=
569
                   |                            |02
             Status|New                         |Open
           Keywords|                            |needs-qa
              Flags|                            |maintainer-feedback?(python
                   |                            |@FreeBSD.org)

--- Comment #1 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> ---
Investigate:

 - Nature of requirement for ca_root_nss. Possible workaround?
 - UX considerations for OPTIONAL ca_root_nss (in particular, disabled case)
 - Alternative root cause resolutions

Note; while cert management isn't a ports domain, the default and out of box
experience with respect to validation of remote servers is. There's an enti=
re
history of bug and user reports going back a long way [1][2] (among others),
and we still don't cover all the bases.

[1] https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=3Drevision&revision=3D388657
[2] https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=3Drevision&revision=3D378720

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-256923-7788-euHp45U1hX>