Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 18:31:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom <tom@sdf.com> To: "Jung, Michael" <mikej@finall.com> Cc: "'freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: arplookup Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980414182856.1884B-100000@misery.sdf.com> In-Reply-To: <c=US%a=_%p=Financial_Allian%l=EXCHANGE-980414194424Z-17136@exchange.finall.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Jung, Michael wrote: > 1st: Is this output from "dmesg" _ daily security files > > arplookup 172.20.1.79 failed: host is not on local network > arplookup 172.20.1.79 failed: host is not on local network > > Is this telling me "I got a pack from 172.20.1.79" but I couldn't > arp and get a mac address? No, something on your ethernet is telling everybody that it is 172.20.1.79, but that address does not fall within the address range for your network. > 2nd - I'm curious where the registration figures (25000 users) came ... The figure is bogus. I don't even know where you got it from, or where it was even mentioned... > 3rd - On a little ol box at home that I put through a lot of stress it > appeared to me I could no longer create > new processes. Their were ~170 running at the time. messages logged > where > > proc: table is full > proc: table is full > > Needless to say I was not out of swap, and the filesystem where /proc > resides had over 1GB free space. Yes, the proc table is full. If you were out of swap, it would say so! Increase MAXUSERS to get a bigger proc table. Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.980414182856.1884B-100000>