Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 2 Jan 2018 18:05:57 -0500
From:      Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble@gmail.com>
To:        Kyle Evans <kevans91@ksu.edu>
Cc:        FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: We do serial differently.
Message-ID:  <CACpH0MdAeUQ187hQiO=grQ%2BXaLOrCRZFQ=jbtQMYq=O3DgCD9w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c0ea7c01-271d-3a97-fdb0-8203fe0c3e6f@gmail.com>
References:  <CACpH0Md0ckYH6k5ufAwCoc-_ThtJHrV9%2BdUtp66%2BSSjVuyhpxA@mail.gmail.com> <CACNAnaEu0-mdO9HTgOX8BRF5_FMVsszQzan6RYKEsLzoMgDXjQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACpH0MdpucayKsWzPN86w9tJkydQhhz5eL8GLHfADE1C12kr3A@mail.gmail.com> <CACNAnaGf7yAP6Sc6coNhZVcZyw0OA1ZUvaOu=t3D-tfn4sXwcQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACNAnaFAbKWFJ9NiR=gS8y_9-RDHzNFACZku8mpaphGZHU2Org@mail.gmail.com> <CACpH0Mcacy_REUPUSbfJ=6UnrBuPU09zgVEG6ZnCW4tSmG9Ohg@mail.gmail.com> <CACNAnaFB5yo0bSdKMCSFhkh8GNvS2t4fQA8ujRDxqPQH2GKLWg@mail.gmail.com> <c0ea7c01-271d-3a97-fdb0-8203fe0c3e6f@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
To summarize, the app "arduino" that controls arduinos works, but the app
"pronterface" that controls an arduino with a specific application loaded,
do not.  Further this seems to be something to do with the handling of the
DTR and/or the actual handling of the DTR signal... and what this all means
to the arduino in question.  To confound things, this all works (of course)
on linux.

If this were a purely work thing, I'd eat my bile and just run linux.  Even
now, I have a R-pi attached to it running linux to "get things done" ...
but I want FreeBSD to work.

So... if I'm charged to fix this, what are my tools?  Is ktrace sufficient
to indicate all the calls to the serial?  How do I interpret it so that I
can make sense of this.  Do I potentially need DTrace or is that overkill?

Some help and pointers would be appreciated.


On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I've tried hacking at directly.  I can't send it a file (as in that
> script) because the printer isn't setup yet.  I'm still working on it.
>
> ... I have poked on the .send() method (with M105) ... and that doesn't
> seem to have effect.  Also ... if I ctrl-C the python process, it doesn't
> exit.  I'm not patient... but so far I've only been able to exit with
> CTRL-\ ... (core dump).
>
> On 27/10/2017 07:59, Kyle Evans wrote:
>
> What happens if you just invoke printcore directly, like the example
> script in the printrun readme?
>
> Pronterface has got to be doing something not-entirely-sane here. The
> reset should always coincide with the port being open()d, and it should
> behave like the Arduino IDE and cu(1) do. The mega doesn't really have any
> crazy requirements just to function properly.
>
>
> On Oct 26, 2017 11:46 PM, "Zaphod Beeblebrox" <zbeeble@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> OK.  I played with this all again ... a bit.
>
> Firstly, when I run "arduino" (the IDE) ... the arduino board resets
> immediately (I can tell this because it has an LCD screen attached).
>
> But when I run pronterface, it doesn't reset until 5 seconds (roughly)
> after pronterface exits.
>
> I tried adding a hardcoded setDTR(0) or setDTR(1) near this code ... but
> it doesn't seem to make any palpable difference.
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Kyle Evans <kevans91@ksu.edu> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Kyle Evans <kevans91@ksu.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Kyle Evans <kevans91@ksu.edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you able to connect to it otherwise (w/ cu or friends) and issue,
>>>>> say, an M105 manually?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> yes.  With CU I can connect, it resets, then I can issue an "M105<cr>"
>>>> and it parrots back some status.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ok, cool, that's expected and sounds like Pronterface is doing something
>>> it shouldn't be.
>>>
>>> I'll poke at it a little bit more- last I checked, it didn't look like
>>> it was doing anything too crazy with pyserial and I've got a working
>>> OctoPrint (w/ pyserial) setup, so I know that works to some extent.
>>>
>>>
>> For the sake of argument, can you try applying the following patch [1] to
>> printrun? I don't see a need to be toggling DTR here, and that might narrow
>> things down a little bit.
>>
>> [1]
>> diff --git a/printrun/printcore.py b/printrun/printcore.py
>> index b54e750..fd531c3 100644
>> --- a/printrun/printcore.py
>> +++ b/printrun/printcore.py
>> @@ -218,11 +218,6 @@ class printcore():
>>                                            parity = PARITY_ODD)
>>                      self.printer.close()
>>                      self.printer.parity = PARITY_NONE
>> -                    try:  #this appears not to work on many platforms,
>> so we're going to call it but not care if it fails
>> -                        self.printer.setDTR(dtr);
>> -                    except:
>> -                        #self.logError(_("Could not set DTR on this
>> platform")) #not sure whether to output an error message
>> -                        pass
>>                      self.printer.open()
>>                  except SerialException as e:
>>                      self.logError(_("Could not connect to %s at baudrate
>> %s:") % (self.port, self.baud) +
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACpH0MdAeUQ187hQiO=grQ%2BXaLOrCRZFQ=jbtQMYq=O3DgCD9w>