Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 16:26:30 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Hobden <markhobden@gmail.com> Cc: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade ideas page Message-ID: <44881776.6060008@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <c57a76300606071344p127709bh7a05dafec5609c4f@mail.gmail.com> References: <4485DBF5.3070705@FreeBSD.org> <c57a76300606070133r37e95b23tff6dda96c74b3a93@mail.gmail.com> <op.tascgccf9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <c57a76300606071344p127709bh7a05dafec5609c4f@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Hobden wrote: >> On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 03:33:25 -0500, Mark Hobden <markhobden@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > My request would be for portupgrade to include an option that runs >> > through every port it wants to upgrade first and runs 'make config', >> > so it does not get stuck half way through an unattended upgrade >> > waiting for options. >> >> This "portupgrade -m 'config-recursive'" doesn't work? I never use >> this -m >> option, so I have no idea if it will working with config(-recursive). > > I believe the command just appends config-recursive to the make command: > make config-recursive PORT_UPGRADE=yes -DFORCE_PKG_REGISTER reinstall > > So if I run: > portupgrade -m 'config-recursive' -a > > I believe I could still get stuck on a config screen after it has > spent some time upgrading the first few ports. > Yes, you're right. -m will not work here. -- Dixi. Sem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44881776.6060008>