Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 10:43:56 +0000 From: "Wojciech A. Koszek" <dunstan@freebsd.czest.pl> To: Valentino Volonghi <dialtone@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "Wojciech A. Koszek" <wkoszek@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: (Should be: MemTrace -- simple tool for tracking memory leaks) Message-ID: <20060616104356.GA85560@FreeBSD.czest.pl> In-Reply-To: <c893b8530606141043g2f545544uea7a6effd2508c82@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060614010531.GA2033@FreeBSD.czest.pl> <20060613233117.GA60384@FreeBSD.czest.pl> <c893b8530606141043g2f545544uea7a6effd2508c82@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 07:43:06PM +0200, Valentino Volonghi wrote: > On 6/14/06, Wojciech A. Koszek <wkoszek@freebsd.org> wrote: > >On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 01:05:31AM +0000, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote: > >> Hello, > > > >And yes, it's better to set a message subject before sending. > [..] > > static int memtrace_cache_misses; > SYSCTL_INT(_vm_memtrace, OID_AUTO, misses, CTLFLAG_RD, > &memtrace_cache_misses, 0, "Number of misses to the MTrace cache"); > static int memtrace_cache_gced; > SYSCTL_INT(_vm_memtrace, OID_AUTO, gced, CTLFLAG_RD, > &memtrace_cache_gced, 0, "Number of garbage collected entries"); > > everything else seems fine to me but I've _VERY_ little experience > with FreeBSD internals and I'm just exploring it these days. Yes, your analysis is correct. I'll either bring your version to the source and deploy memtrace_cache_gced, or remove it at all. Thanks, -- Wojciech A. Koszek wkoszek@FreeBSD.org http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/dunstan/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060616104356.GA85560>