Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 14:59:29 +0200 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> To: "Ass.Tec. Matik" <asstec@matik.com.br> Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw error in last stable version freebsd 8 Message-ID: <20100401125929.GA66321@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <ca289b41257e17cf3f3ee6a3638e1586.squirrel@wm.matik.com.br> References: <4BB24C86.3030709@hardonline.com.br> <20100331020943.GA47928@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20100331164302.GA55699@korolev-net.ru> <20100331170221.GB55010@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <cd82fc45e95950cb83326ef7c1f28323.squirrel@wm.matik.com.br> <20100401002014.GA57424@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <ca289b41257e17cf3f3ee6a3638e1586.squirrel@wm.matik.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 04:50:45AM -0300, Ass.Tec. Matik wrote: > > seems to be some more confusion > > > 00002 rule > ..... other rules > 01000 rule > ..... other rules > 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0 > 00000 ip from any to any > > > the last as I said in my former msg but the #00100 is listed at the end, not > at it's correct sorted position, seems sticks to _when_ added i fixed this problem (which is related to all the reports you are posting) tuesday night in svn 205953. By chance are you still running an older kernel ? cheers luigi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100401125929.GA66321>