Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 00:30:08 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> To: "Andrew Pantyukhin" <infofarmer@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@freebsd.org>, Sam Lawrance <lawrance@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: sourceforge subdir default Message-ID: <20060428003008.19f61dbc@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <cb5206420604270827r2c03fbacx9e391a3e9489398@mail.gmail.com> References: <cb5206420602180112k135e0569o360f02aad4fd4b0b@mail.gmail.com> <127FEBDA-4446-47DB-B6CA-4AB6A5CE8562@FreeBSD.org> <cb5206420604270827r2c03fbacx9e391a3e9489398@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:27:38 +0400 "Andrew Pantyukhin" <infofarmer@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/18/06, Sam Lawrance <lawrance@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > On 18/02/2006, at 8:12 PM, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > > > > I wonder if we can set MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR to > > > PORTNAME by default when MASTER_SITES is > > > equal to MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE or > > > M_S_SF_EXTENDED? We don't have to take care > > > of ':whatever', just handle the simplest case - and > > > it will save hundreds of lines. > > > > How? > > Okay, I wonder if we can set M_S_SUBDIR to PORTNAME > by default no matter what MASTER_SITES we have. I mean > if there's a %SUBDIR% to replace, PORTNAME seems to be > a reasonable default value, doesn't it? I've been thinking about the same thing for some time. Care to provide: a) patch for b.p.m b) patch for affected ports where this is true ( c) the rest of M_S_SF ports should work w/o modifications ) ? I'll do a test for all the affected ports. -- IOnut - Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" BOFH excuse #10: hardware stress fractures
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060428003008.19f61dbc>