Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 03:16:00 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org> To: "FreeBSD Ports" <ports@freebsd.org>, "Chin-San Huang" <chinsan@freebsd.org>, "Andrey Slusar" <anray@freebsd.org>, "Stanislav Sedov" <stas@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: xpi updates Message-ID: <cb5206420705021616i1eead919rb899045380f79f50@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <cb5206420703300200u4361ccdar867ee13394612fb5@mail.gmail.com> References: <cb5206420703300200u4361ccdar867ee13394612fb5@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/30/07, Andrew Pantyukhin <infofarmer@freebsd.org> wrote: > Dear xpi-extensions maintainers, > > Some of you granted me an implicit approval for > routine updates of your xpi ports. That was some > time ago and now I ask you to renew the approval. > If you want to, just reply to this mail (you > don't need to include all the recipients, of > course) to tell me it's okay. > > I would gladly send you patches for approval, but > in most cases an update takes a few seconds, while > the total time spent on patches and approvals can > amount to minutes per update. It's just a question > of efficiency. Dear Chin-San, Andrey and Stanislav! All other xpi-maintainers have already responded. Here's a short list of out-of-date extensions: xpi-unplug xpi-sessionmanager xpi-vimperator I'll be glad if you could grant me an implicit approval to update your xpi-ports for you whenever I perform version-bump sweeps of my own ports. Stanislav, welcome to our little xpi club :-) When dealing with others' ports I usually try to be as little intrusive as possible - performing only the very necessary/minor changes and keeping the style intact. Anyway, it's okay if all of you prefer to keep your ports to yourself, but I would appreciate a (negative) response anyway just to be sure it's not a matter of a lost e-mail. Thanks guys!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420705021616i1eead919rb899045380f79f50>